Educational performance of institutes of technology and polytechnics
Educational performance of institutes of technology and polytechnics
In 2015 we allocated funding to 18 institutes of technology and polytechnics (ITPs).
In 2015 we allocated funding to 18 institutes of technology and polytechnics (ITPs).
The following tables show how the Tertiary Education Strategy (TES) groups – Māori and Pasifika learners, and at-risk young people – performed in 2013, 2014 and 2015 compared to all students at ITPs (for Student Achievement Component (SAC) funding and Youth Guarantee (YG) funding).
|
Table 1: 2015 education performance for SAC-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||||
|
2015 SAC |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
Student progression levels 1–4 |
Student retention |
|
Overall |
59,715 |
80% |
74% |
34% |
66% |
|
Māori |
14,595 |
74% |
65% |
35% |
62% |
|
Pasifika |
6,485 |
73% |
66% |
36% |
66% |
|
Under 25 |
29,885 |
79% |
68% |
40% |
70% |
|
Table 2: 2015 educational performance for YG-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||||
|
2015 YG |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
Student progression levels 1-4 |
Student retention |
|
Overall |
2,493 |
73% |
65% |
48% |
69% |
|
Māori |
821 |
66% |
59% |
41% |
59% |
|
Pasifika |
347 |
67% |
59% |
60% |
72% |
|
Table 3: 2014 education performance for SAC-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||||
|
2014 SAC |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
Student progression levels 1–4 |
Student retention |
|
Overall |
61,194 |
80% |
73% |
35% |
66% |
|
Māori |
14,904 |
74% |
64% |
36% |
62% |
|
Pasifika |
6,316 |
74% |
65% |
39% |
61% |
|
Under 25 |
31,360 |
79% |
67% |
41% |
69% |
|
Table 4: 2014 educational performance for YG-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||||
|
2014 YG |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
Student progression levels 1-4 |
Student retention |
|
Overall |
2,330 |
72% |
65% |
41% |
68% |
|
Māori |
711 |
62% |
54% |
35% |
61% |
|
Pasifika |
313 |
72% |
64% |
56% |
67% |
|
Table 5: 2013 educational performance for SAC-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||||
|
2013 SAC |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
Student progression levels 1-4 |
Student retention |
|
Overall |
63,088 |
80% |
73% |
36% |
64% |
|
Māori |
14,650 |
75% |
65% |
37% |
61% |
|
Pasifika |
6,661 |
73% |
59% |
41% |
62% |
|
Under 25 |
32,729 |
78% |
66% |
43% |
69% |
|
Table 6: 2013 educational performance for YG-funded students in the ITP sector. (EFTS = equivalent full-time student) |
|||
|
2013 YG |
EFTS delivered |
Successful completion of courses |
Completion of qualifications |
|
Overall |
1,983 |
70% |
60% |
|
Māori |
707 |
63% |
53% |
|
Pasifika |
209 |
67% |
56% |
Note: Qualification completion rates can be affected by increases or decreases in enrolments which can result in variability in the reported performance between years.
What data have we excluded?
If an organisation is funded for less than five equivalent full-time students (EFTS), we don’t report educational performance indicators (EPIs) results. This is to ensure that individual students are not identified.
If an organisation has fewer than 30 EFTS at a particular level of study, we don’t report EPI results for that level, so that any comparison of rates is based on statistically robust sample sizes.