2018 Quality Evaluation

2018 Quality Evaluation

Last updated 10 May 2018
Last updated 05/10/2018

This page provides information and guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation for the Performance-based Research Fund.

It describes quality evaluation and has information about panel nominations, the PBRF sector group, guidelines for quality evaluation, panel members and moderators for 2018 Quality Evaluation.

What is the Quality Evaluation?

The Quality Evaluation is an assessment of the research performance of staff at participating tertiary education organisations (TEOs) by an expert peer-review panel. It is held periodically and is the major component of the Performance-based Research Fund (PBRF).

The Quality Evaluation process is based on the submission and assessment of Evidence Portfolios. Specialist peer review panels assess Evidence Portfolios against agreed standards and this process is moderated by the Principal Moderator and Deputy Moderators.

Participating TEOs are also required to review their staff against the eligibility criteria and participate in our audit processes.

Once the panel decisions have been made and approved, the results are given to each participating TEO and a report on the Quality Evaluation results is published.

The next Quality Evaluation round will be held in 2018.

2018 Quality Evaluation – PBRF Sector Reference Group

Information about the 2018 Quality Evaluation Sector Reference Group (SRG) can be found on the SRG page.

Information about the consultation process and the SRG consultations papers (as well as their respective feedback summaries and feedback templates) can be found on the SRG Consultation Papers page. 

Guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation

The Tertiary Education Commission (the TEC) and the PBRF Sector Reference Group have developed operational guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation. These guidelines incorporate the valuable feedback provided by the sector and other stakeholders as a part of the Sector Reference Group (SRG) consultation process.

Refer to the PBRF Resources and publications page to view operational guidelines.

The table below shows the main audience for each document. A Y indicates that the document also contains information relevant to that particular audience.

AudienceGuidelines for staffGuidelines for TEOsGuidelines for assessmentPanel-specific guidelines
Staff members Main audience

  Y

Y

Y

TEOs

Y

Main audience

Y

Y

Peer review panels     Main audience

Y

If you have any questions about the fund or the Quality Evaluation process you can email these to pbrfhelp@tec.govt.nz

Chairs, Deputy Chairs and Panel Members for the 2018 Quality Evaluation

Evidence Portfolios (EPs) submitted as part of the PBRF Quality Evaluation process are assigned to one of 13 peer review panels that will assess and evaluate the EPs. You can view the list of panels and panellists (Chairs, Deputy Chairs and Panel Members) for the PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation.

The panel appointment process occurred in two stages. The first stage closed in September 2015 and included the appointment of Chairs, Deputy Chairs, and an initial cohort of panel members. The second stage of the nomination process closed 26 February 2018. The final panels were publicly announced on 10 May 2018. 

 

Moderators for the 2018 Quality Evaluation

We have appointed Professor Paula Jameson to the role of Principal Moderator for the 2018 Quality Evaluation. Joining the moderation team as Deputy Moderators will be Distinguished Professor Marston Conder and Professor Helen May.

Professor Jameson is Professor of Biology and the former Head of the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Canterbury. She chaired the biological sciences panel in the 2012 Quality Evaluation and was a member of this panel in both the 2003 and 2006 Quality Evaluations.

Distinguished Professor Conder was a Deputy Moderator for the 2012 Quality Evaluation and the former Co-Director of NZ Institute of Mathematics and its Applications at the University of Auckland. He was the Chair of the working group that worked with the Tertiary Education Advisory Commission on the development of the PBRF in 2002, and was also the Deputy Chair of the Sector Reference Group which designed the 2012 Quality Evaluation.

Professor Helen May is a Professor of Education in the field of early childhood education at the University of Otago and the former Dean (2006–2011) of the College of Education. She chaired the education panel in the 2012 Quality Evaluation and was a member of this panel in the 2006 Quality Evaluation.

More information available in the FAQs

We have published questions raised by stakeholders about the 2018 Quality Evaluation and our answers to them. We have grouped the “FAQs” into five areas: 

You can find these FAQs on the right under In this section.

 

Audit process

The PBRF 2018 Quality Evaluation is supported by a comprehensive compliance audit programme. The objective of the audit programme is to provide assurance to the TEC that the guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation have been consistently and correctly applied by all participating tertiary education organisations. The audit process has two phases: Process assurance and Data evaluation.

KPMG has been appointed as the auditor for the 2018 Quality Evaluation following a competitive procurement process. 

Reports:

Also refer to FAQ's Audit process